PD-L1 expression

Overall mortality

PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low PD-L1 7 (100) 31 (91.2)
High PD-L1 0 (0) 3 (8.8)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High PDL1 positivity in tumor cells 9606893.11 (1.3e-122, NA) 0.99 1.56 (0.47, 5.18) 0.49


PD-L1 H-score in tumor cells

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low PD-L1 7 (100) 31 (91.2)
High PD-L1 0 (0) 3 (8.8)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High PDL1 H-score in tumor cells 9606893.11 (1.3e-122, NA) 0.99 1.56 (0.47, 5.18) 0.49

PD-L1 positivity in stromal cells

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low PD-L1 5 (100) 20 (87)
High PD-L1 0 (0) 3 (13)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High PDL1 positivity in stromal cells 1.1e+07 (3.5e-122, NA) 0.99 3.92 (1.04, 14.85) 0.074


FOXP3 expression

Overall mortality

FOXP3 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low FOXP3 2 (28.6) 18 (54.5)
High FOXP3 5 (71.4) 15 (45.5)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High FOXP3 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes 0.33 (0.043, 1.79) 0.23 0.74 (0.37, 1.49) 0.4


FOXP3 positivity in stromal lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low FOXP3 1 (50) 7 (53.8)
High FOXP3 1 (50) 6 (46.2)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High FOXP3 positivity in stromal lymphocytes 0.86 (0.029, 24.95) 0.92 0.49 (0.15, 1.58) 0.23

FOXP3 positivity in tumor cells

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low FOXP3 0 (NaN) 0 (NaN)
High FOXP3 0 (NaN) 0 (NaN)


CD8 and Ki67 expression

Overall mortality

CD8 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low CD8 2 (28.6) 21 (63.6)
High CD8 5 (71.4) 12 (36.4)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High CD8 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes 0.23 (0.029, 1.24) 0.11 0.89 (0.42, 1.88) 0.75


CD8-Ki67 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low CD8-Ki67 3 (42.9) 27 (81.8)
High CD8-Ki67 4 (57.1) 6 (18.2)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High CD8-Ki67 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes 0.17 (0.026, 0.94) 0.043 0.45 (0.18, 1.09) 0.057


CD8 positivity in stromal lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low CD8 0 (0) 7 (63.6)
High CD8 1 (100) 4 (36.4)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High CD8 positivity in stromal lymphocytes 4.7e-09 (NA, Inf) 1 0.64 (0.16, 2.50) 0.51


CD8-Ki67 positivity in stromal lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low CD8-Ki67 0 (0) 11 (91.7)
High CD8-Ki67 1 (100) 1 (8.3)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High CD8-Ki67 positivity in stromal lymphocytes 4.3e-10 (NA, Inf) 1 0.65 (0.081, 5.23) 0.67


Ki67 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes

Summary table
ANOD + AWD (%) DOC + DOD (%)
Low Ki67 3 (42.9) 13 (41.9)
High Ki67 4 (57.1) 18 (58.1)

Logistic and Cox’s proportional hazards regression models
Predictors Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
High Ki67 positivity in intratumoral lymphocytes 1.04 (0.18, 5.51) 0.96 0.50 (0.23, 1.09) 0.084